An interesting take on the “myth of library employment shortage.”
Here’s the local listing for library jobs. I don’t know the local graduation rate, but I would guess it’s upwards of 30+ a year. You can do the math.
an eddy in the bitstream
An interesting take on the “myth of library employment shortage.”
Here’s the local listing for library jobs. I don’t know the local graduation rate, but I would guess it’s upwards of 30+ a year. You can do the math.
Yet again. I’m experimenting with more CSS and trying to make it a little easier to navigate.
I use it. Don’t you?
But at what cost?
We spent a lot of time discussing Google in my library class last fall. Google is ripe fodder for librarian anxiety, because at first glance, it poses the single biggest threat to the future of real, live, paid librarians. From the Google email site:
Sounds like a library mission statement, yes?
As a poet put it, in the information glut, poets are the ones who help discern knowledge from information. That’s what librarians do too. And usually with a little less opaqueness than poets.
But if the powerful Google aims to do the same thing, how can mere mortal librarians stand in its mighty path? Do they need to? Librarians use Google all the time, as a tool to help find relevant and authoritative information for library users.
It’s well known, however, that it is possible to buy and/or fool rankings in Google. And rank is the arbiter of authority, at least, to the casual user (ie., 95% of Google users).
So for now, librarians provide that vital service: helping weed what’s relevant and authoritative from what’s not. That’s what librarians have always done. Can Google replace that function? Can a machine replace a human being?
That’s a pretty stale question, I know. Perhaps a better point to make is that if we believe that a machine can replace a human being, then we will fail to fund things like libraries and librarians. If the popular mindset is that Google offers everything a librarian can, soon there won’t be a library to go to.
Got this great spam last week. Part of the lastest spam trend: non sequitor emails intended to elicit a reply — just so the spammer will know they hit a real address. It’s like TV: free entertainment delivered right to my screen.
Beautiful.
I was at the dentist this morning, and amid the smalltalk, the dentist made this off-hand comment that I hear so often from my fellow Minnesotans: I wouldn’t mind more 40-degree days.
Around here, that’s a very warm winter day.
Comments like that really bother me. They’re symptomatic of our culture’s myopia. I enjoy the occasional 40-degree day in February — the annual February thaw is a holy thing — but that’s not the problem. The problem is when we have lots of 40-degree days in a winter. Winter after winter. Then it’s not weather anymore; it’s climate. And climate change, while perhaps unavoidable in the long run, is going to alter human life on this planet — and not for the better.
© 2025 peknet
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑